The Dutch government wants to improve the use of Free Software and open standards in the public sector. It has just published an action plan “Nederlands open en verbinding” (pdf), which is intended to give public bodies more independence from IT suppliers and raise the level of innovation.

According to the document, public entities have to use open standards in their IT, or justify why they’re unable to do so. In procurement, they have to consider Free Software.

The plan takes a number of cues from research done at UNU-MERIT, in particular the 2006 FLOSSImpact study (pdf). The study argues that Free Software offers great economic benefits, both for the public and the private sector. It points out that to fully profit from Free Software and open standards, public procurement needs to change — pretty much in the way that the action plan describes.

Always happy to help

What happens to your data if your experiment fails? If the results turn out different than you thought? If there’s nothing to publish?

Don’t throw it away. Your dead end might be another person’s missing link.

Wired Magazine has an essay by Thomas Goetz on this “dark data”.

He says that while storing huge amounts of data can be an issue, the real problem is the culture of science:

More and more, research is funded by commercial entities, which deem any results proprietary. And even among fair-minded academics, the pressures of time, tender, and tenure can make openness an afterthought. If their research is successful, many academics guard their data like Gollum, wringing all the publication opportunities they can out of it over years. If the research doesn’t pan out, there’s a strong incentive to move on, ASAP, and a disincentive to linger in eddies that may not advance one’s job prospects.

But Goetz says that the dark data phenomenon isn’t limited to science:

Getting science comfortable with exposing its dark data is really just the beginning. Once you start looking for it, dark data is everywhere: It’s locked away in out-of-print books and orphaned art, the stuff that Creative Commons and Google Book Search have been bringing to light. Speaking of which: Hey, Google! Know all those research projects your employees do that the company will never green-light? How about letting the rest of the world take a crack at them?

The challenge is to find a way to share the data. How about the Comprehensive Knowledge Archive Network I blogged earlier?

Karsten Gerloff and Rishab Aiyer Ghosh participated at the TACD conference, “The Reform of WIPO: Implementing the Development Agenda,” on 17 September in Geneva. The meeting followed a successful three year campaign to reorient the technical assistance programme of WIPO (the World Intellectual Property Organization) to serve the interests of developing countries. In his presentation Rishab Aiyer Ghosh showed how Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) has successfully built an ecosystem that relies on sharing knowledge, not on monopolizing ideas. Supported by extensive quantitative and qualitative evidence he argued that WIPO will need to take alternative models of knowledge management into account if it does not want to become obsolete.

Rishab’s presentation on why it’s rational to collaborate in the production of immaterial goods is available here (pdf). IP Watch reports on the conference here.